Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here – discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Ali Khamenei in January 2026
Ali Khamenei

Glossary

[edit]
  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

[edit]
  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

[edit]
  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting items marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

[edit]

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

[edit]
  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

[edit]
  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

[edit]

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Structure

[edit]

This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. Eight days of current nominations are maintained – older days are archived.

To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.


March 6

[edit]

2026 Winter Paralympics

[edit]
Article: 2026 Winter Paralympics (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The 2026 Winter Paralympics open in Milano and Cortina d'Ampezzo, Italy. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The 2026 Winter Paralympics open in Milano and Cortina d'Ampezzo, Italy.
News source(s): [1]
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 --BabbaQ (talk) 19:04, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Leave opening ceremony article unbolded The main 2026 Winter Paralympics article should be the bolded focus. CastleFort1 (talk) 19:40, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

European navies mobilise to protect Cyprus

[edit]
The President of Cyprus speaks following drone strikes on the island.
Article: 2026 Iranian strikes on Akrotiri and Dhekelia (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ European navies send warships to protect Cyprus after it is attacked by drones. (Post)
Alternative blurb: NATO allies send ships to defend British military bases in Cyprus after a drone attack.
News source(s): BBC, Euronews, France 24, El Pais, Politico, Sky
Credits:
Article updated

Nominator's comments: A further widening of the Middle East conflict in which European navies act to protect this island after the British base is found to be weakly defended. It's ironic to see the French, Netherland and Spanish navies acting so firmly in this, given their history of conflict with the Royal Navy. I think this is being coordinated by NATO and so that's sending a signal of solidarity. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:52, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support on significance This is a widening of the conflict beyond the Middle East. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 11:16, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose part of the Iran conflict. Masem (t) 12:37, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on significance, wait on quality Support good faith nomination in principle, but it would be worth specifying in the article and blurb whether the drones were sent by Iran or Hezbollah when we have access to reliable sources naming the party responsible. The news coverage at present is ambiguous and the blurb could be interpreted as if the drones attacked Cyprus on their own. This is especially the case here given the article is titled 'Iranian strikes on Akrotiri and Dhekelia', but the first line of the article contradicts that by stating 'either Iran or its Lebanese proxy, Hezbollah' was responsible). Oppius Brutus 12:47, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think all developments should be contained to one blurb. Salmon Of Ignorance (talk) 12:58, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you think this please? The current blurb reads:

Israel and the United States launch strikes on Iran, killing its supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, along with other senior officials.

but this is an event from a week ago which doesn't even hint at an ongoing and widening conflict. Isn't it our job to to be more up-to-date and informative? Andrew🐉(talk) 13:07, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Because otherwise every news item would be Iran. Including Issues in Cyprus, the attack off Sri Lanka and the closing of the straight of Homuz. When this ends up in ongoing it'll all be in there.
I'm no 100% opposed to thinks making it out of ongoing into the news but it needs to be a high barrier. Salmon Of Ignorance (talk) 16:59, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Cyprus is not Iran. Sri Lanka is not Iran. The events in those places are in the news and our current blurbs don't say anything about them. What we are blurbing are other places like Brazil and Bolivia but those stories are not in the news now because they happened a week ago and there isn't continuing coverage. The Salmon of Ignorance doesn't explain his preference for keeping ITN stale by shutting out fresh news. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:29, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It's literally the same war as the current top blurb. Suggest a modification to that blurb if this is so significant. I'm also curious in how the French, Dutch and Spanish navies have been in conflict with the British navy this century or even last (let alone the relevance). Have you forgotten Suez ... I think there may have been other joint UK/France naval operations last century </sarcasm>. I feel you are more here to play soldiers than ITN. Nfitz (talk) 18:26, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, this is covered by the blurb and will be covered by ongoing once it rolls off. They also didn't strike the country of Cyprus, but a British military base (a British overseas territory), presenting this as against Cyprus is wrong Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 13:10, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's not rolling though, is it? The current blurb has been stuck without moving for a week now and still presents the matter as specific strikes rather than an ongoing conflict. As for Cyprus, see Anger... Andrew🐉(talk) 13:16, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Rather than nominating sensationalist headlines like ITN's a news ticker (let's be honest, it is atm), maybe try something actually educational or encyclopedic? Like looking through papers/magazines known for high quality analysis that can identify big stories of the kind we don't usually post, there's the Financial Times, Africa Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, National Geographic, New Scientist, Der Spiegel etc. Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 13:31, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    I try to use good sources and especially like The Economist but it's a weekly while other periodicals such as National Geographic are monthly. The trouble is that ITN works on a daily schedule and anything that's a week old will be dismissed as stale. I quite agree that ITN should take a more considered view and recently suggested a brainstorming/workshop process for working up stories which require a deeper dive. The usual suspects rushed to oppose that like they oppose any and every attempt to improve ITN. So we have to work with ITN as it is, not as we might like it to be. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:54, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    The problem editors appear to have had there was that those kinds of stories are too complex for a blurb, and they develop gradually rather than one big moment. ITN can only really cover the 'big moments' because of the nature of blurbing. It's also become habit and convention to oppose and snow close your noms, I think they're often an aspect of another story, rather than the meta stuff people are looking for. Re blurbs, if a blurb can show significance, ie. how it affects people's lives, the impact on international politics etc., maybe some will sneak through :) Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 14:12, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    I found this story when browsing Portal:Current events/2026 March 5 where I was impressed that the French were sending a carrier to Cyprus while the RN was still getting up steam. Those portal pages are listed every day at ITN but no-one ever refers to them. I suppose that's because they are quite straightforward and there's no arguing. Editors mainly seem to come to ITN for the drama but that's dysfunctional and is what stops it getting much done. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:29, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
"Editors mainly seem to come to ITN for drama" - the same time as writing a ridiculous polemical statement like "It's ironic to see the French, Netherland and Spanish navies acting so firmly in this, given their history of conflict with the Royal Navy." when proposing this blurb. You have a history of making comments and nominations at ITN that many would perceive as creating drama - what about the Claude proposal last month complete with sarcastic comments about another editor's proposal regarding the name of an Indian state? AusLondonder (talk) 17:18, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Anthropic and Claude are still making lots of news. For example, see The Take: How is the US using Anthropic’s Claude AI in Iran? -- that's from just two hours ago. ITN's failure to report the continuing major stories about them is strange. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:33, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Your nomination was doomed because yet again you used it to engage in point-scoring such as piping the link from the United States Department of Defense to the US Department of War and make petty comments about how irrelevant news from India is. You're doing the same thing here with unnecessary, off-topic comments such as suggesting it is ironic France and Britain, who haven't fought each other for over 200 years, are both defending Cyprus. AusLondonder (talk) 18:00, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This shows how the conflict is now bringing in Europe. Guz13 (talk) 17:59, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The alternative blurb is factually incorrect as the military assets are being dispatched from various countries to defend Cyprus more generally, not specifically the British base, as the sources make clear. AusLondonder (talk) 18:06, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Iran has fired missiles and drones at a score of facilities that the US air force are using. With many defensive moves. NATO members such as the UK and Turkey have already been fighting defensively - which might be more significant. If we had an ongoing, this would be a non discussion. But we don't have an ongoing because this war is still blurbed (and the top blurb at that). If it's that significant, combine with existing blurb. Nfitz (talk) 18:17, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note - "Drone" is the colloquial term used by the media but NOT military sources, when it's almost always incorrect. The proper term is UAV - Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Most of them are discount cruise missiles or loitering munition. The word "drone" came about because of semi-automated UAVs and has been used incorrectly for everything from RC quadcopters, to Shaheds. Note that even short description calls it "Iranian unmanned aerial combat vehicles." Harizotoh9 (talk) 18:37, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose To think that this is even remotely notable in the context of what is going on Iran is baffling enough that I can't see this as anything other than Andrew voicing frustration with ITN with another WP:POINTY nomination. Gotitbro (talk) 19:30, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

March 5

[edit]

Chile eliminates leprosy

[edit]
Article: Epidemiology of leprosy (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: World Health Organization verifies Chile as the first country in the Americas, and the second in the world after Jordan, to eliminate leprosy. (Post)
News source(s): IFLScience, NDTV
Article needs updating

 UCinternational (talk) 13:57, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose since this is not even the first case of leprosy being eradicated in a country. Also the linked article doesn't mention the fact that either country eradicated leprosy either. NotKringe (talk) 15:00, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The article needs work before it can featured. Guz13 (talk) 17:58, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support on notability, article is in poor shape though Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 20:03, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Bob Harlan

[edit]
Article: Bob Harlan (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [2]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Green Bay Packers executive. Classified as a good article on Wikipedia. EaglesFan37 (talk) 23:45, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support GA. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 11:17, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Ready article is a GA.   Jalapeño   (u t g) 13:11, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
PostedBagumba (talk) 17:54, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Sea level

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Population below sea level after 1 metre rise
Article: Sea level (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Global sea levels are found to have been underestimated, especially in SE Asia and Oceania. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ A meta-analysis reveals that global sea level rise has been underestimated by an average of 25cm, due to a lack of use of local direct measurements.
News source(s): CNN, FT, Nature, New Scientist, NYT, PBS, Science News, Turkiye Today
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: The story is rather technical but we're here to help explain such topics to the general reader. Andrew🐉(talk) 07:54, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - trivia. The attached image is also confusing and wouldn't be helpful to readers.   Jalapeño   (u t g) 08:09, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    The sea level is rising due to thermal expansion and melting ice.
    The image comes from the Nature paper. It is rather busy but it highlights the impact on populations, which seem to be non-trivial. Note also that we are currently blurbing a flooding story in a comparatively small region.
    There are other global charts in the paper and we have other options such as a simple image from our article (right).
    Andrew🐉(talk) 08:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Trivia, not suited for ITN. I'm by no means that informed about how people at DYK handle their trivia/noms, but this could maybe be a possible nom for them. TwistedAxe [contact] 08:28, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've nominated numerous articles at DYK and so am very familiar with their criteria. The sea level article does not qualify as it's not new, having been created over 20 years ago. It was created early in the life of Wikipedia as it is considered level-4 WP:VITAL – a fairly fundamental topic for the encyclopedia. The flooding article that we're currently blurbing would have been eligible for DYK because it's new. And it's more trivial because it's not vital per WP:NEWSEVENT. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:22, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    I think it's very very clear, @Andrew Davidson, that you absolutely do not understand their criteria, based on the number of times you repeat the same mistakes. Your contribution here is a net waste of time for the project. Are you the only person who doesn't see this? Nfitz (talk) 18:30, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – Nice work to Pol098, but the article update is not appropriately significant to warrant featuring yet. Especially if, subjectively, the blurb is so vague. I do like a blurb that is more specific. I proposed an alternative. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 09:02, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • The alt gives an average global figure of 25 cm which doesn't sound like much. But note that sea level rise explains that Between 1901 and 2018, the average sea level rose by 15–25 cm ...  This was faster than the sea level had ever risen over at least the past 3,000 years. So, the revision is over a century's worth of comfort room. And it's just an average so some areas, such as SE Asia, get the sea lion's share. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:35, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am bewildered by the "trivia" !votes, as this discovery/reveal has enormous implications. An additional 25 centimeters on top of any other estimates already in play is huge. This is why this news story meets WP:ITNSIGNIF so easily, as shown by the sources listed in the nomination. I don't know what to make out of these "trivia" comments, they seem to come out of nowhere. I'm not familiar enough with the field or with this new paper to know if this is the biggest climate news story of the past decade, but I expect it's in that domain. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:40, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • They seem to be the sort of dismissive one-word comment which WP:ITNDONT advises against: curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. The actual reliable sources don't seem to use the word "trivial". Instead they indicate that there are significant implications for over 100 million people. For example,

    Torbjorn Tornqvist, a geology professor at Tulane University in Louisiana who was not involved with the study, said the findings were a real “wake up call,” with wide implications. “We finally have a really full blown, robust effort to sort this out and the result, it’s somewhat dramatic,” Dr. Tornqvist said.

    Andrew🐉(talk) 09:47, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) 2026 World Baseball Classic

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2026 World Baseball Classic (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The 6th edition of the World Baseball Classic, the premier international baseball tournament, kicks off today. (Post)
News source(s): Yahoo! Sports IOC USA Today
Credits:

Article updated
 KKhuc92 05:50, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

March 4

[edit]

RD: Lou Holtz

[edit]
Article: Lou Holtz (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ESPN
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Needs some work. Natg 19 (talk) 00:17, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

IRIS Dena is torpedoed

[edit]

Nominator's comments: The sinking seems to have made quite an impact. This seems to be partly because of the graphic video footage, which is in the nomination; partly because it harks back to WW2 when submarine warfare was more common; partly because it happened outside the Gulf and so extends the area of conflict; and partly because of the diplomatic effect of such action on India who was hosting the international review. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:42, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Shipping crisis

[edit]
Proposed image
Articles: 2026 Strait of Hormuz crisis (talk · history · tag) and Sinking of IRIS Dena (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Vital shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz collapses as a US submarine torpedoes a ship for the first time since WW2. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Vital shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz collapses.
News source(s): BBC, DW, Guardian, Reuters, Reuters, Sky, WGOWS
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: There been a lot of focus on the air war in Iran but the biggest economic effect seems likely to be a shipping crisis. You may recall how a single ship getting stuck in the Suez canal caused a lot of trouble. Or the Red Sea crisis provoked by the Houthis. Well this new situation seems to be bigger as there's no going round the Strait of Hormuz and this is a big deal for a lot of countries. There hasn't been much actual action there but the immediate effect on the insurance market has shut down most traffic. And there are sinkings elsewhere which are unsettling the global shipping industry. A US sub has sunk an Iranian frigate off Sri Lanka. And Ukrainian drones have sunk a Russian LNG carrier in the Med. Maybe these might be blurbed separately but let's start somewhere. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:42, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Salmon Of Ignorance (talk) 09:54, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Meanwhile, the economic ramifications continue to mount up and headlines include:
  1. Gulf shipping crisis threatens food price shock
  2. Gulf food strategy tested as Iran war snarls shipping routes
  3. Iran attacks prompt Red Sea rethink as box shipping exits Strait of Hormuz
  4. Asia shipping hubs anticipate disruption
Andrew🐉(talk) 18:07, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
We do not post stories based on being headline news, period. We are not a newspaper, ITN not a news ticker. Masem (t) 19:03, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The current Iran war blurb was posted in less than two hours because of significant coverage, front headlines in outlets,mass coverage from multiple news sources,Multiple media outlets are covering the attack, front page news on many outlets. Masem's theory doesn't fit the facts. Andrew🐉(talk) 19:25, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No, that wasn't the reason the war blurb was posted, but you are pushing that here. Masem (t) 20:13, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Masem, keep in mind the nominator here has a rather distorted view of how ITN works. The Kip (contribs) 19:43, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Then why haven't we topic-banned them yet for being disruptive, and repeating falsehoods that they have been corrected on many, many times? Nfitz (talk) 17:58, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This is a strange bundling of stories, these two events lack any direct correlation beyond both being naval action related to the war in Iran. Frankly I would Support a blurb centered on just the Strait closure and impending oil crisis around the world, it's something that impacts pretty much every corner of the globe, but shoehorning in the sunken ship is strange to me. BSMRD (talk) 02:10, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Oppose - This blurb doesn't make sense. The strait isn't closed because of the torpedoed ship. Guz13 (talk) 06:03, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose as covered by existing blurbs. And 'X as Y' headlines, where the link between X and Y is either (a) obscure, as here, or (b) causal in a way that belongs in the headline, which is very much not the case here, are a blight on modern journalism. GenevieveDEon (talk) 08:30, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • Split The combined presentation was a tentative start, as explained in the nomination. As this is not liked, I've reworked this nomination with an alt focussing just on the shipping crisis. The sinking story has been split off now. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:01, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support a blurb that mentions the rise in global oil prices Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 13:37, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dissolution of Unification Church

[edit]
Article: Unification Church (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Tokyo High Court orders the dissolution of the Unification Church of Japan in wake of the 2022 assassination of Shinzo Abe. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The dissolution of the Unification Church in Japan is upheld by the Tokyo High Court, following the 2022 assassination of Shinzo Abe.
News source(s): Japan Times, BBC
Credits:

Nominator's comments: aka the "Moonies". While there is a route to appeal to the Supreme Court, that is not considered a standard step here and the high court's devision is considered final. Article likely needs more updates. Masem (t) 14:26, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support on significance, oppose on quality - at present the article is a bit of a mess, both in terms of organisation and prose quality. But the dissolution of a major and controversial religious organisation seems highly significant and worthy of inclusion. GenevieveDEon (talk) 14:34, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as from the blurb it's not even clear what's being dissolved. Unification is based in South Korea, but the blurb says "Unification Church of Japan", while the article and the linked BBC source say the organization as a whole, all of this putting aside whether the Tokyo High Court has the power to dissolve a foreign organization. Departure– (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Other sources all point to this only at the Japanese chapter, as dissolution forces the to lose the designation as a church in Japan affecting taxes, etc. Masem (t) 16:13, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
If it is just the dissolution of the Japan chapter, this does not seem "significant" to me. Closing of the entire church overall would be significant for ITN. Natg 19 (talk) 16:50, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support an alt that removes the link to the Shinzo Abe assassination. That was years ago and it may have set off a chain of events, it's not directly linked. Also, blurb can make it more clear it's the Japanese Chapter: "The Tokyo High Court orders the dissolution of the Japanese chapter of the Unification Church" Harizotoh9 (talk) 16:52, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
My reading from the sources all say that Abe's assassination triggered the investigation into the church leading to this decision. There are other contributing factors why the decided that way that existed before the assassination, but the church was only put under the microscope from that. Masem (t) 16:59, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You can argue the string of events are related, but the legal decision was done after an investigation. So it's best to say "after an investigation..." rather than tying it to an assassination several years ago. Harizotoh9 (talk) 01:35, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
But nearly all sourcing for this story today mention this being a result of the assassination, and it would seem inappropriate to not mention that event that we posted back when as a driver for this finding. Masem (t) 05:05, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that may be the broader context and someone may read an article for the broader context. But for a headline, the direct chain of events is: Investigation --> conclusion --> Action. The blurb as written implies Abe was assassinated, authorities sat around for a few years and shrugged their shoulders and dissolved the Japanese branch. Harizotoh9 (talk) 17:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note that this blurb is NOT the dissolution of the Unification Church. The order is only for the Japan chapter/branch of the Church. Natg 19 (talk) 00:13, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support on significance as per above. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 23:37, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
To add, this decision was already made in 2025 and was only upheld by the High Court now. So posting it now makes no sense. I oppose for this reason, and I updated the altblurb to reflect this.   Jalapeño   (u t g) 13:00, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The reason to post now is that for purposes of Japan's legal system, the Tokyo High Court ruling is considered final (from the sources), comparative to when the US Supreme Court rules on something. There is a route for an appeal to the Japanese Supreme Court but all sources suggest this is rarely ever used. Masem (t) 15:29, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Follow the money: Casting this as some branch operation's closure is extremely misleading. Despite Moon's Korean start, the Japanese branch has long been the most successful of all, and deeply intertwined for decades with Japanese politics. The last detail was suppressed for decades, until the Abe assassination forced it into the open. See the 2-2-2026 New Yorker article on the trial of Abe's assassin and his recent conviction. ~2026-14366-36 (talk) 16:01, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Supreme leader

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Mojtaba Khamenei (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Mojtaba Khamenei is elected as the new Supreme Leader of Iran by the Assembly of Experts. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Mojtaba Khamenei is elected Supreme Leader of Iran following the death of Ali Khamenei during strikes by the U.S. and Israel.
News source(s): Hindustan Times, Iran International
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: The news is breaking currently and so the article will need more updating but it seems consistent with recent events and expectations. The mainstream western sources are not rushing to report this yet though. My impression is that news is slow to emerge from Iran currently due to Internet and other disruption. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:21, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support update to current blurb regarding the US-Israeli strikes and death of Ali Khamenei, as it's a continuation of the same news story. Kurtis (talk) 12:00, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    That blurb is getting longer and longer Salmon Of Ignorance (talk) 13:12, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait Both given sources above as well as other reports [3] all suggest he is either the top pick or likely will be voted, but there's been zero official word on this. Obviously, once affirmed, this should be added to the existing blurb since it's not likely to fall off ITN for a few more days at this rate. Masem (t) 12:32, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait Correct me if I am wrong but he hasn't been voted in yet Otto (talk) 13:17, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment looks like most sources are saying he's the favourite candidate and tipped to win but not officially confirmed.
Salmon Of Ignorance (talk) 13:20, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It could be that they are putting security measures in place before making a big announcement because Israel has already said it will try to kill the next Supreme Leader too. See Iran postpones Khamenei’s farewell as Israel threatens to kill successor. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait There's no official statement made by the Assembly. Wait until they confirm it, and then update accordingly. I want to agree with Masem about integrating it into the current blurb, but with the blurb already being as long as it is right now, I'm slightly leaning towards a new blurb as this is about the election of a new leader and counts as ITN/R. TwistedAxe [contact] 14:59, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    The new updated blurb could be "Mojtaba Khanemei is elected Supreme Leader of Iran following the death of Ali Khanemei during strikes by the U.S. and Israel." Masem (t) 15:12, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Sounds good. Will add as an altblurb & consider it a support once the Assembly confirms Mojtaba is picked as the Supreme Leader. TwistedAxe [contact] 17:15, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It appears Iran International had Mojtaba Khamenei confirmed as supreme leader, per "informed sources". That could be why there's such a rush to post, even if "informed sources" is shaky at best for a blurb post. I'll also add they're not, to my knowledge, the most unbiased source for Iranian politics, so I echo calls to wait. Departure– (talk) 15:35, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
My impression of Iran International is that they have good contacts in Iran and so will be well-informed. They may have an agenda too but WP:RSP doesn't have an entry for them. Let's see how this "exclusive" plays out. Andrew🐉(talk) 16:00, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Wait for confirmation, as per above. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 02:14, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Dennis Cometti

[edit]
Article: Dennis Cometti (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ABC News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Australian sports commentator, player and coach of Australian rules football HiLo48 (talk) 03:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

support Shawdowpouncer2 (talk) 14:33, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Don't even have to click the article, there's a {{cn span}} in the preview. Departure– (talk) 21:08, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Make that a strong oppose. The section "Comettiisms" features the textbook definition of WP:CITEOVERKILL--twenty-three refs stacked on top of each other. For your amusement, I've attached it here. Departure– (talk) 21:17, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like someone removed that section. Natg 19 (talk) 00:14, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Song Ping

[edit]
Article: Song Ping (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): South China Morning Post, Reuters
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Last living member of the Second Generation of Chinese Leadership, died at 108/109 years old. CastleFort1 (talk) 15:12, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Article has been significantly improved by TinaLees-Jones. - Indefensible (talk) 03:59, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

March 3

[edit]

RD: Alvin Greene

[edit]
Article: Alvin Greene (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [4]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: B-Class article, campaign for senate in 2010 in South Carolina received significant media coverage EaglesFan37 (talk) 14:50, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support Article looks great.   Jalapeño   (u t g) 14:52, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) March 2026 lunar eclipse

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: March 2026 lunar eclipse (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A total lunar eclipse occurs in North America, Asia, and Oceania. (Post)
News source(s): NASA
Credits:
Nominator's comments: We already posted total solar eclipses before like the April 2024 eclipse. Interstellarity (talk) 01:46, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This event happened on 3 March 2026. Departure– (talk) 01:54, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2026 Rubaya mines collapses

[edit]
Article: 2026 Rubaya mines collapses (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: A collapse at the Rubaya mines kills over 200 people, including approximately 70 children. (Post)
News source(s): Xinhua
Credits:

Nominator's comments: This collapse is different from the one on January 28 (although both are in the same article), so I believe that this is not stale. However, updates are scant on the March 3rd collapse. WFUM🔥🌪️ (talk) 22:22, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This new collapse should be a separate article from the January collapse, not to mention that this article is lacking detail and isn't of great quality.   Jalapeño   (u t g) 07:51, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good work to Bloxzge 025 for updating the article. I don't think the article's update is very detailed yet, but if we hadn't featured this article yet back in January, I'm comfortable with it getting blurbed as-is now. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 07:56, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not ready. We posted the January collapse and this new one seems of similar magnitude and impact. So in principle I would support posting another blurb. However the article has only two sentences about the March event, which say nothing beyond the nominated blurb. This needs at least a full paragraph of referenced prose about the March incident before it could be posted. Modest Genius talk 12:13, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose AP says that the facts are disputed. As this is a remote warzone, we're unlikely to get good independent confirmation. Andrew🐉(talk) 20:48, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The quality on this article needs to be improved. Guz13 (talk) 06:13, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Ready) RD: Andrew Watson (bishop)

[edit]
Article: Andrew Watson (bishop) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Alton Herald
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Bishop of Guildford. Article looks good. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:26, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support Article looks fine. Scuba 05:22, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well-written, factual article. Public figure. Baldwin de Toeni (talk) 15:27, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Unreferenced date of birth. Schwede66 21:59, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Added ref. Baldwin de Toeni (talk) 14:19, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Muhammad al-Khuli

[edit]
Article: Muhammad al-Khuli (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): New Arab
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Syrian air force officer. Article looks good. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:25, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Soft support article is fine, but it's lacking in detail about how he was a part of the 1963 coup. Scuba 05:27, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Ongoing: 2026 Iran conflict

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2026 Iran conflict (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Strikes and major escalations have been going on recently. Has continued for multiple days now. TwistedAxe [contact] 16:28, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) 2026 Iranian strikes on Cyprus

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2026 Iranian strikes on Cyprus (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Several Iranian and Hezbollah strikes hit Cyprus, including Akrotiri and Dhekelia. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Iran and Hezbollah launch strikes on the island of Cyprus, specifically Akrotiri and Dhekelia.
Alternative blurb II: Strikes are launched by Iran and Hezbollah hit the country of Cyprus, the only geographically non European member of the European Union, and the overseas territories of UK called Akrotiri and Dhekelia.
Alternative blurb III: ​ Non-Essential personnel temporarily evacuates Akrotiri following Strikes on the island of Cyprus.
News source(s): [5] [6] [7] [8]
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Several bombings hit CyprusSqualwer (talk) 12:43, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I cancel this. Squalwer (talk) 16:00, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Eric Allan

[edit]
Article: Eric Allan (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Telegraph Birmingham Live
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: British Actor best known for his role in The ArchersItsShandog (talk) 09:47, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Article is a stub. JaxsonR (talk) 17:20, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Stub, has major quality issues.   Jalapeño   (u t g) 13:09, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

March 2

[edit]

Aramco refinery attack

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2026 Aramco refinery attack (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Saudi Arabia's largest oil refinery, Ras Tanura (pictured), shuts down for weeks following Iranian drone attacks. (Post)
News source(s): Reuters - ABC, NYT
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Saudi Arabia's largest oil refinery has halted operations after a foiled Iranian drone strike. Dog Oxide(talk) 23:34, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. This is a small part of the wider war, which already has a blurb. I'm also sceptical that this event merits an entire article - it could be a single paragraph in Economic impact of the 2026 Iran war. Modest Genius talk 12:46, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    As the Wikipedian below stated, this is Saudi Arabia's largest oil refinery and a huge part of their oil export chain. Its closure means a large disruption to Saudi oil exports as a whole. Given these effects, I think it can be considered notable enough. DoO2 21:22, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This is Saudi Arabia's largest oil refinery and they plan to close it for weeks. They plan to reroute its output via the Red Sea but that's where the Houthis hang out. Seems like this might be quite significant and the current blurb doesn't even mention Saudi Arabia or the other affected producers. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:02, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Nikolay Kolyada

[edit]
Article: Nikolay Kolyada (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.teatral-online.ru/news/39730/
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: selected plays need some citations. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:17, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support after selected plays is cited.   Jalapeño   (u t g) 13:10, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Yanar Mohammed

[edit]
Article: Yanar Mohammed (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New Arab
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Assassinated Iraqi activist. - Indefensible (talk) 03:54, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support now, updates have been pretty thorough and the article is now pretty well sourced. ~Malvoliox (talk | contribs) 23:14, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

March 1

[edit]

RD: Käthe Menzel-Jordan

[edit]
Article: Käthe Menzel-Jordan (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Thüringer Allgemeine (in German)
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: German architect, died at age 109, worked on the restoration of prominent historic buildings in around Erfurt after the destruction of World War II. Article was mostly there as a translation from de. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:16, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Neville Peat

[edit]
Article: Neville Peat (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/conservationist-author-deeply-loving-man
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Article looks good. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:07, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Yuri Korolev (ice hockey)

[edit]
Article: Yuri Korolev (ice hockey) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://iz.ru/en/node/2051324
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Article looks good. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:07, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. The article is basic but seems a reasonable biography, sufficiently referenced, and has been updated. I'll assume good faith on the Russian-language source for his death. Good enough to post. Modest Genius talk 12:50, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Christine Johnson McPhail

[edit]
Article: Christine Johnson McPhail (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.wral.com/news/local/saint-augustines-president-christine-mcphail-death-march-2026/
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Academic administrator. Seems good though it is pretty short. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:00, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD proposal: Iranian officials killed during war

[edit]
Article: List of Iranian officials killed during the 2026 Israeli–United States strikes on Iran (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  The Israeli and United States airstrikes on Iran kill many Iranian officials, including defence minister Aziz Nasirzadeh, IRGC commander Mohammad Pakpour, and Armed Forces chief of staff Abdolrahim Mousavi. (Post)
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: With so many notable figures dying in the wars, I propose that we add the list of Iranian officials killed in these strikes. We're getting a large amount of short-term RD noms and RD blurb proposals from the assassinations incurred in the past two days, and I think that this would be a great way to compress everything down and reduce fighting over whether these RDs should be featured or not. The blurb above is how I propose it whould look on {{ITN}}, but y'all can propose other formats. — Knightoftheswords 21:12, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Um... I don't think it's a bad idea, frankly. I think we could make an extraordinary exception, but obviously the list is incomplete (the former Iranian president is missing, for example) and I think we also need to review the quality of the articles listed. _-_Alsor (talk) 21:24, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
At present, we have 5 RD noms pending and Khamenei's that we blurbed. There are at least 5 more that could be nom'd. I can't think of any precedent for this happening, and this isn't a bad solution to the fact that at least 11 notable people died within a short span and only one or two have a chance of being blurbed. 1brianm7 (talk) 22:40, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Makes sense since we have multiple Iranian officials who were killed yesterday and having a single list on RD while preserving the current RD people on is best. Otherwise we’d have a bunch of Iranian officials name on the main page for at least a whole day. The only exceptions is the blurbed assassination of Ali Khamenei and possibly Mahmoud Ahmadinejad if confirmed. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 22:49, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per above. This is an unusual circumstance for RD. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 22:51, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support If that article list did not exist, individual nominations for each death for Iranian officials would likely overshadow other RDs that could be nominated. The perspective for viewers browsing the main page should also be considered, as the viewer would most likely see lots of Iranian officials on RD when in the case of individual nominations. This article is a solution to this extraordinary case. CastleFort1 (talk) 23:14, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: To tell the truth, I think with the rapid developments, we should consider actually having an "ongoing" event for this conflict. Trump just said he expected the war to last a month. And with the constant exchange of missiles, it seems this flare-up isn't going to end soon.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 01:00, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Though it should be noted that Trump is not a reliable source for anything. He is also on record negotiating a ceasefire here at this very time. Gotitbro (talk) 04:17, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
oppose it is part of the blub.Psephguru (talk) 01:45, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
this is an RD nom, not blurb nom? Ion.want.uu (talk) 04:57, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support and set as precedent this is a great solution for situations like this where large sums of notable people die in a very short period of time all for the same reason, and could be applied to so many situations like wars or accidents where this type of stuff may happen. Ion.want.uu (talk) 04:56, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Merged into the existing blurb. – robertsky (talk) 15:16, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
We should close all of the relevant proposed entries below which are covered by this blurb and will no longer be individually posted. - Indefensible (talk) 21:34, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per above. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 21:36, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Interim Leadership Council of Iran

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Ayatollah Alireza Arafi who sits on the council with the President and Chief Justice.
Articles: Interim Leadership Council (talk · history · tag) and 2026 Iranian Supreme Leader election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ An Interim Leadership Council is appointed to rule Iran pending the election of a new Supreme Leader. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ An Interim Leadership Council is appointed to rule Iran pending the election of a new Supreme Leader which is delayed by destruction of the Assembly of Experts building in Qom where the votes were being counted.
News source(s): Al Jazeera, AP, China Daily, France24, Reuters
Credits:
Article updated
One or both nominated events are listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: This council is now the top body in Iran it seems. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:39, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait A new supreme leader is ITNR indeed, but this is different than that. I'm not so sure about whether the existence of an interim leadership council passes the threshold... is the interim council the holder of the office, as required by ITNR, or rather an interim body governing during a period where there is no 'holder of the office'? In any event, even if it is ITNR, I'm also seeing conflicting reports flat out saying that Alireza Arafi is officially the new leader. We should wait until there is either greater clarity or perhaps until the Assembly of Experts has formalized the change. FlipandFlopped 15:02, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    The body that makes this call is the Expediency Discernment Council. Iran seems better organised than the US when it comes to observing its constitution, eh? Andrew🐉(talk) 15:06, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Implied by the existing blurb - someone has to be running the country albeit for a temporary period after the death of the leader. Once someone more permanent is named, likely weeks to months away, then that would be the ITNR to post. Masem (t) 15:19, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    That's nonsense. Sometimes you get anarchy, civil war or a power struggle if the succession is not well-organised. And, even if it's done properly, as in this case, the point of the ITN/R event is to announce the name(s) of the people now in charge. We should not just leave readers to figure this out for themselves. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:27, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Whether its ITNR or not is debatable, but even if ITNR, the posting of a specific ITNR can be discussed if it should be posted when there are unusual situations. This is such a case, in addition to the double coverage in blurbs that we are trying to avoid. Masem (t) 16:35, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    We should probably have a decision in interim/acting leaders, We've skipped the merry-go-round in South Korea before, and it seems this is a similar matter now... but not Peru. (For some reason, I also don't think people would skip acting/interim PMs in European countries.) Howard the Duck (talk) 16:44, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Because interm leaders are just that, temporarily, they shouldn't automatically be a ITNR blurb. Nearly all the time, the reason there's an intern leader is due to the leader having died, resigned, or similar, and that is nearly always a blurb-worthy on its own, so I would expect in that article to learn what the interm leadership will be pending the country's laws, and if there is reasonable space in the blurb, to include it there. Masem (t) 18:20, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    There's a good reason such interim/acting leaders be excluded from ITNR, isn't it? Howard the Duck (talk) 20:03, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    If we know there's a more permanent leader selection in the near future in the absence of a standard line of succession (as we do here), yes. If this was going to be around for years before they'd get to naming a new leader proper, sure, but we know that's not the case now. Masem (t) 03:19, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    We have an ongoing situation now with multiple new developments such as the shutdown of shipping in the Gulf. We shouldn't let the existence of the initial blurb prevent posting more updates as this might cause a gridlock. Andrew🐉(talk) 16:46, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Needs work The article has very little prose outside of mentioning the council's formation and quoting from Iran's constitution. FallingGravity 15:42, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Looks like a very short term development. The same Al Jazeera article linked in the nomination says: "Although the leadership council will govern in the interim, the Assembly of Experts “must, as soon as possible,” pick a new supreme leader, according to the Iranian constitution." Nsk92 (talk) 15:48, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    The state of war may delay this. They probably won't want to be assembling their top people in one place for a while... Andrew🐉(talk) 15:56, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. This is not ITNR because it is just a temporary/transition committee. This event is part of the big picture which contains alot of important events. This specific event does not deserve its own blurb. Tradediatalk 16:27, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support We should be figuring out how to put all these individually notable and blurb-worthy events into 2 or 3 blurbs, or perhaps even a banner like we had for the pandemic. We hear all the time about "systemic bias" at ITN. If an analogous event happened in a Western country, involving the death of the incumbent leader, a former president, high-ranking defense officials, a triple-digit death toll of literal children at an elementary school, the activation of emergency constitutional measures, etc., etc., etc., do we really think we would post only one blurb? Davey2116 (talk) 17:02, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, find past examples to prove your point rather than conjecturing. This is not bias, it is not being hasty. - Indefensible (talk) 17:07, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Your response further proves my point. As stated as obvious fact by many above, this is an unprecedented event to happen in any country. To ask for a past example of this, especially within Wikipedia ITN history, is just silly. Davey2116 (talk) 06:10, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    A recent precedent is Venezuela. The swearing in of Delcy Rodríguez as the acting president was nominated as ITN/R and posted at ITN. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:41, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    It was a single blurb, not multiple blurbs. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:In_the_news&oldid=1331944317
    The point is that it was posted. The mechanics of bundling the various developments in Iran are an implementation detail. Maybe we should have a bigger blurb with more than one sentence so that we can cover all the key points. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:22, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Also that is an incumbent leader, this is just a council to pick a leader which is only expected to last a few days.
    - Indefensible (talk) 02:02, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Expectations vary. See this analysis which the article presents as

    The appointment of a new successor has been described by Suzanne Maloney, vice president of the Brookings Institution as necessarily "improvisational" and "dictated by the context of the moment", and as experts warn that "a smooth process is nearly impossible", her expectation is that the temporary council will remain permanent.

    So, we'll just have to wait and see about that. In the meantime, we should report what we do know so that readers have the current up-to-date position and thus emphasize Wikipedia as a dynamic resource. Andrew🐉(talk) 07:37, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - wait until a leader is selected. - Indefensible (talk) 17:04, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose We don't usually post interim or acting leaders when a new leader is to be elected/appointed soon (for example, Bangladesh usually has an interim PM before an election, if I recall correctly). I've seen reports that state that a new supreme leader will be appointed in 2-3 days - so let's wait. Khuft (talk) 19:02, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait Reliable sources suggest we have no clear idea what the bleep is going on in Iran's government right now. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:24, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait A new leader is likley to be soon elected and at the moment we have multiple articles 2026 Iranian leadership crisis, Interim Leadership Council, 2026 Iranian Supreme Leader election with much duplication and none upto par. Gotitbro (talk) 19:57, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    And I agree with others above. This is not ITNR, neither the council nor Arafi succeed Khamenei as the supreme leader/head of state which is going to be decided by the election. Gotitbro (talk) 20:03, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait per Gotitbro. The Kip (contribs) 20:41, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hold until a new SL is elected or something else happens This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 01:32, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Update Reuters reports that the council has met and this confirms that the transition is happening. Meanwhile the IRGC has a new commanderAhmad Vahidi. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:46, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait. This is just an interim body. 331dot (talk) 09:54, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose interim leadership is to be expected after the assassination of the previous dictator - which is already blurbed - and I assume (and will support) and ongoing Middle East War or something after it rolls off. When a new dictator comes to power, that should be blurbed. Nfitz (talk) 00:10, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The Assembly of Experts in the holy city of Qom
That's a remarkable development. I wonder whether they had reached a decision on the new supreme leader or whether that will now be delayed while they find some more experts. When we have more details, we might add something about this to this blurb. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:14, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The latest reporting says that the assembly building in Qom was destroyed while the votes were being counted and that this was done by Israel deliberately to delay election of a new supreme leader. I'll add an alt to this effect. Andrew🐉(talk) 19:59, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

February 28

[edit]

RD: Johana Ng'eno

[edit]
Article: Johana Ng'eno (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AP Reuters
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Kenyan politician Bloxzge 025 (talk) 12:42, 2 March 2026 (EST)

(Closed) RD: Mohammad Pakpour

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Mohammad Pakpour (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cn5ge95q6y7t?post=asset%3Abf732579-0cec-4aef-a365-639c15b11925#post
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:09, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) RD: Aziz Nasirzadeh

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Aziz Nasirzadeh (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.iranintl.com/en/202603017664
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Minister of Defence of Iran Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:09, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Merge under Multiple Iranian officials. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 01:02, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) RD: Abdolrahim Mousavi

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Abdolrahim Mousavi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.ilna.ir/%D8%A8%D8%AE%D8%B4-%D8%B3%DB%8C%D8%A7%D8%B3%DB%8C-3/1757256-%D8%B3%D9%BE%D9%87%D8%A8%D8%AF-%D8%B9%D8%A8%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D8%AD%DB%8C%D9%85-%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B3%D9%88%DB%8C-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D8%B4%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%AF%D8%AA-%D8%B1%D8%B3%DB%8C%D8%AF
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Chief of staff of the Iranian Armed Forces. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:09, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Merge under Multiple Iranian officials. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 01:03, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) RD: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): New York Post
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.
Nominator's comments: Previously the Iranian president between 2005-2013. TwistedAxe [contact] 14:40, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Wait It is not clear that he is dead. Let's wait a while for further information. If he is, I don't know to what extent I would add it to Khamenei's blurb because neither the President of Iran governs nor am I so sure that Ahmadinejad had a particularly important role at present. _-_Alsor (talk) 21:28, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support inclusion in shared blurb when ready - He was, in his day, a major figure in national and international politics (and the article should reflect that). Once that and other article quality issues are addressed, I would support adding his name alongside Khamenei's in the main blurb. GenevieveDEon (talk) 23:11, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb when ready per GenevieveDEon. A former head of state's assassination being a relative blip with all that is going on is indicative of how much that is going on in such a short amount of time. I'd have to agree and state that he was a relatively major figure during his tenure. Ornithoptera (talk) 09:18, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Wait - No one pointing out that NY Post and tabloids are posting this? These sources should be put on a blacklist. It hasn't been confirmed as of yet. Harizotoh9 (talk) 10:12, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The nomination's claim that the article has been updated is now contentious as the death is disputed and so I've set it to "no". The only source listed is the New York Post, which is not impressive. This needs a lot more work and confirmation before it can be considered. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:13, 2 March 2026 (UTC) (edit conflict)[reply]
  • Oppose for now pending confirmation and article improvements. Would support a blurb (or merging into the current blurb by name) if confirmed, but all we have at the moment is the NY Post, who are not trustworthy at all, and similar rumors. Agreed with Harizotoh9. -GhostStalker (Got a present for ya! / Mission Log) 18:59, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above awaiting confirmation of death. --SpectralIon 15:30, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose and close the source that the nominee used is considered unreliable (WP:NYPOST). The Wikipedia page says that the death is disputed. This is an unusual case that is almost the opposite of the Khameini case: Iran may have claimed he is dead, but Israel and the United States have not claimed anything. [9] If the target page isn't saying he's dead, then this nomination is dead in the water, if you pardon the phrase. Unknown Temptation (talk) 23:09, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) 2026 Minab school airstrike

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2026 Minab school airstrike (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: An airstrike on an elementary school in Minab, Hormozgan province, Iran, kills at least 165 people, mostly schoolgirls. (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times, Al Jazeera
Credits:
Nominator's comments: I believe this deserves a spot on ITN due to its very high casualty count. Hsnkn (talk) 19:56, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
That is already going to be covered by the strikes and we'd usually not have doubling-up of blurbs. We'd normally try to incorporate blurbs into one, but given the word that Iran's leader was killed, that's going to have far higher billing to include with th existing one. Masem (t) 19:58, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
That is a rumor. This is affirmd. Plus that could be its own blurb.Psephguru (talk) 20:21, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The Khamenei nom has been withdrawn as of writing this. Is there a way I can nominate this to be merged with the 2026 Israeli–United States strikes on Iran blurb? Hsnkn (talk) 20:22, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest an altblurb.Psephguru (talk) 20:30, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
support and merge VERY notable 80+ deaths, but together with the current one.Psephguru (talk) 20:19, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
oppose until confirmed by independent media. Also, there's currently a discussion about deleting the article, exactly because of lack of independent corroboration. Khuft (talk) 20:22, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
[10]Psephguru (talk) 20:29, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The nominated article itself says there's no independent confirmation about the number of casualties. Khuft (talk) 20:37, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
oppose per Khuft and its already covered by the most recent blurb. _-_Alsor (talk) 20:40, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support on notability A high civilian casualty count is notable. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 00:00, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose the air strike has already been posted. Nfitz (talk) 00:18, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality Poorly sourced and article is marked for deletion, especially given there are no reliable sources which give any details about the casualty count. So far, only Iranian state media has provided primary sources of the airstrikes (as The Kip rightly points out) and other sources are simply quoting them in turn, which is plainly inadequate for inclusion on ITN. Oppius Brutus 00:35, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Verification I see comments that this isn't verified beyond state (Iran) media but our article says this "videos taken of the destroyed school immediately following the attack were verified by The New York Times, Reuters, and Iranian fact-checking organization Factnameh, as authentic; these videos were compared against existing imagery of the school. Drop Site News published accounts of the incident from several parents whose children were among those killed." So this certainly did take place but I agree the article quality is very poor. Gotitbro (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
al jazeera did. please read.Psephguru (talk) 02:32, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Psephguru Al Jazeera attributes the news to Iranian state media. The Kip (contribs) 03:38, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I now support blurbing this (or appending this to the extant blurb). This is a significant enough event to be featured separately and the article and the sources are now much more firmer about the school being bombed and multiple children being killed. Gotitbro (talk) 09:05, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Wiki has perecedent for thisPsephguru (talk) 02:34, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose this strike is the part of attack already covered in an another blurb, no need to fill ITN with this entry of the strikes. LiamKorda 04:12, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose covered by existing blurb Ion.want.uu (talk) 16:09, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support combining with current blurb This is a major mass-death event that likely would have been the focus of the blurb about the strikes if it weren't for the assassination of Khamenei overshadowing it. I think we have enough room to mention this.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 01:06, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into existing blurb The current blurb gives the impression only one person was killed in the strikes. Mentioning the current estimated death toll gives a more accurate impression of the scale of these strikes. FallingGravity 04:43, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    We don't know the context of this at all. We don't know if it was a missile strike, or an air-defense missile, or any number of things. It's also a closed Iranian system that no one can double check. We can say something hit the school, some people probably died, but we can't confirm many details. Harizotoh9 (talk) 11:18, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Regardless the school was struck and children were killed. And I don't any sources actually counter the Iranian statements, if anything independent video verification and witness testimony only confirms the claims. Gotitbro (talk) 14:59, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Other innocent (non govt, non military) people in Iran have been killed in these attacks too. We should not be focusing on one attack simply because it involved children. Now, if later this is called a war crime and waatents made for arrests, that would be a reason to focus on this. Masem (t) 18:21, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    • Switching to conditional Support Should be fine as long as the estimated death toll is attributed to Iran and the alleged perpetrators aren't identified pending further confirmation. FallingGravity 19:02, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) Ali Khamenei

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Ali Khamenei (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei (pictured) is killed by an Israeli drone strike. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Israel and the United States launch strikes on Iran, with an Israeli drone strike killing Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei (pictured).
Alternative blurb II: ​ Israel and the United States launch strikes on Iran, with an Israeli drone strike killing Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei (pictured).
Alternative blurb III: ​ Iran confirms Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei (pictured) was killed in an Israeli drone strike.
Alternative blurb IV: Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is killed as part of a series of joint Israeli-American strikes on the country
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:

Article needs updating

Nominator's comments: Reuters reporting just now that his body has been found.   Jalapeño   (u t g) 19:52, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

strong oppose and close the source is an israeli one. That is not confirmation.Psephguru (talk) 19:56, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This if confirmed by non-Israel/US sources, should be incorporated into the existing strikes blurb. Masem (t) 19:59, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed IFF. Its BLP atm.Psephguru (talk) 20:00, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Wait - BBC headline is literally "Unconfirmed reports that Iran's supreme leader is dead". https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cn5ge95q6y7t Harizotoh9 (talk) 20:04, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Wait More confirmation from independent sources and/or Iranian media is needed. CastleFort1 (talk) 20:11, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
comment based on the REtaliation, he is likely dead. however, need a proper source like Iran confirming it,Psephguru (talk) 00:00, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Iran has confirmed his daughter ad grandson were killed. Not notable for ITN, but just a heads up.[11]Psephguru (talk) 00:58, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support combined blurb, with picture Notability is clearly met, and the quality of the article appears to be sufficient. CastleFort1 (talk) 01:45, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Khamenei confirmed dead via Iranian state media. Rooves 13 (talk) 01:46, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
support altblurb3 Based on Irnas' reaction, I'm 99% sure he's dead, but just wait a few hours. IT is 5am there.Psephguru (talk) 01:55, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Their state media has confirmed his "martyrdom". TwistedAxe [contact] 01:56, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Probs the article is locked down, since i expect nonsebse.Psephguru (talk) 02:03, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support combined blurb and any other answer is objectively wrong. There is no need for an explanation. MountainJew6150 (talk) 02:08, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support combined blurb; seems good enough in quality per above, though I wish the foreign policy section was updated with more information about today. The article's in remarkably good shape otherwise, and I extend my congratulations to everyone who brought it to the state it is now. Departure– (talk) 02:10, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Admins willing to post ITN: looks like there is a consensus for a combined blurb? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 02:10, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Lol Aren’t you an admin willing to post ITN? Chorchapu (talk | edits) 02:12, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
They are requesting a different administrator make a decision here because they left a !vote in favor of posting, see WP:INVOLVED.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 02:18, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Good on you.Psephguru (talk) 02:22, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support altblurb4, most clear and concise blurb. — Knightoftheswords 02:13, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, tht ooks good.Psephguru (talk) 02:21, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Ali Shamkhani

[edit]
Article: Ali Shamkhani (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Iran International
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Iranian defense official and top advisor to Khamenei. Killed in the U.S./Israel strike. Davey2116 (talk) 17:10, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, opposing for now Further confirmation is needed on the status of Iranian officials before nominating for RD. CastleFort1 (talk) 18:55, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, because it may be true, but we need confirmation. Israel is saying this, but we can't confirm this. Right now the headline would be "Israel says" or "Israel announces". May be confirmed later? Harizotoh9 (talk) 19:51, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
oppose the sourcfe is not even reliable.Psephguru (talk) 19:56, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Wait/Oppose Claim is not supported by any credible sources, I would be willing to blurb if his death was confirmed hungry (talk) 20:29, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
In theory, could be combined with Khameini IFF true.Psephguru (talk) 20:31, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

PULL Never seen this done before so it might be WP:IAR. But Shamkhani's death is now part of the blurb, so there's no need to keep it on the RD stream. --SpectralIon 23:15, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: MaryAnn Bin-Sallik

[edit]
Article: MaryAnn Bin-Sallik (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): SBS ABC News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: First Indigenous Australian to get a doctorate from Harvard. Died last Saturday but reported today. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 10:28, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Makybe Diva

[edit]
Article: Makybe Diva (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [13]
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

 Happily888 (talk) 09:14, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet ready Multiple CN tags. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 09:21, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Article looks good as of now. Rooves 13 (talk) 01:49, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2026 Israeli–United States strikes on Iran

[edit]

Nominator's comments: Major event with significant coverage. - Indefensible (talk) 07:12, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support obvious. Scuba 07:18, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait Too many uncertainies in a rapidly developing situation. Let us wait out for a bit to see what has been struck and for the article to somewhat stabilize. Gotitbro (talk) 07:28, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    And quality issues persist: half the article is background, the other half security measures in Israel, barely anything on the places struck, damage done and people killed in Iran. Cannot blurb this. Gotitbro (talk) 07:40, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Another dangerous attack. ArionStar (talk) 07:31, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Needs work The article currently leads with a focus on Israeli operations which is puzzling in the light of recent coverage about US intentions. It seems that they are trying to take out the Supreme Leader but describe the attack as preemptive. Perhaps they saw a window of opportunity and so went for it. We need some time to clarify this as we can't simply take official statements from the warring parties on trust. Andrew🐉(talk) 07:36, 28 February 2026 (UTC) (edit conflict)[reply]
Support - Multiple media outlets are covering the attack, and while it isn't exactly clear what has occurred, there seems to be confirmation from Trump himself that the US participated in the attack Oakchris1955 (talk) 07:42, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support: major event of high importance, front page news on many outlets CROIXtalk 07:51, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support sigh here we go agian. LiamKorda 08:36, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – After posting the blurb which described a one-way attack, there have now been retaliatory strikes. That brings up two issues:
- Fuzheado | Talk 11:55, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The crisis article indeed appears to be unnecessary duplication. I wouldn't really change the hook as there are no stable articles here. The blurb though can be amended by merely apending that Iran has also conducted retaliatory strikes at US bases in the Gulf and in Israel. Gotitbro (talk) 13:09, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neither title is perfect as 2026 Israeli–United States strikes on Iran doesn't allow for the counter-attacks and 2026 Iran–United States crisis doesn't include Israel. It's really just another phase in the Middle Eastern crisis (2023–present) which involves many countries. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:16, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Follow the precedent used by United States strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Also the move/merge request on the article talk page currently has consensus for support but is wrong for the same reason. - Indefensible (talk) 17:37, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
How come Israel is listed first before the US, isn't the US taking the lead here? Is it because of alphabetical order? QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 13:22, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2026 Bolivian Air Force Lockheed C-130 crash

[edit]
Article: 2026 Bolivian Air Force Lockheed C-130 crash (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A Lockheed C-130 Hercules operated by the Bolivian Air Force crashes in El Alto, causing at least 20 deaths and 30 injuries. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ A Bolivian Air Force Lockheed C-130 Hercules crashes in El Alto, causing at least 20 deaths and 30 injuries.
Alternative blurb II: ​ A Bolivian Air Force plane crashes in El Alto, killing at least 20 people
News source(s): [14] [15] [16]
Credits:

 Wildfireupdateman (talk) 05:30, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support but wait and needs link in blurb - Support as it (perhaps being overshadowed by the Iran strikes) is significant, however the article is a bit of a stub and needs some work. The blurb also needs a link to the article in it, perhaps linking the article to 'crashes' Elizaofchaos (talk) 07:54, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose We do not usually post about minor military aircraft accidents because they are part of the routine risk of that activity. I believe that twenty fatalities in this case is not a figure that, although regrettable, is neither monstrous nor ITN-worthy. _-_Alsor (talk) 10:15, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Last Year UPS Airlines Flight 2976 was posted with similar casualty figures, however I completely see how this is nothing compared to the Middle East conflict currently Elizaofchaos (talk) 10:27, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
While it is true to we don't post military craft accidents, that's on the presumption that all deaths or injuries were to military personnel (such deaths being considered part of the risk of their job). Like with the UPS flight, this had significant innocent ground casualties, so absolutely fair to consider it. Masem (t) 13:29, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • The fact that there appear to be significant casualties on the ground (who presumably are not military personnel) may make this more significant than a routine military accident, but currently the article is just too short. So oppose for now.Nigel Ish (talk) 11:39, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support For a bit more background, the article states that the plane was carrying bank notes and attracted a crowd of demonstrators. However, like the Louisville crash, this one happened on a highway in a highly populated area and thus casualties were not confined to merely military personnel. Article is barely past the quality I recommend for a feature. Departure– (talk) 14:59, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alternative blurb one - More detailed, yet concise. Quality of article is fine to post. CastleFort1 (talk) 21:17, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Alt1 violates SEAOFBLUE, however. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 22:12, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Alt Blurb II - as others have said, this blurb is the most efficient. Rooves 13 (talk) 01:50, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I agree with Aviationwikiflight in that depth of the article is pretty borderline/marginal, and would benefit from a little bit more expansion. I wouldn't consider a 3-sentence paragraph (i.e. Background) to meet the minimum requirement toward "three complete, referenced and well-formed paragraphs". SpencerT•C 04:25, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Original Blurb or Alt1, Strong Oppose Alt2 The number of injured seems worth mentioning, and the general type of plane which crashed is a central detail that simply must go in the blurb. "Plane" could be anything from a Cessna to an Airbus A380. Of course it should be specified. At the very least, we should include something in the blurb so the reader does not get the false impression that only a small fighter jet (or alternatively, a large Boeing 747) has crashed. FlipandFlopped 15:53, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 23:38, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Lorraine Bayly

[edit]
Article: Lorraine Bayly (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [17]
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

 Happily888 (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

February 27

[edit]

(Closed) 2026 Cuban crisis

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2026 Cuban crisis (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
Credits:
 ArionStar (talk) 02:02, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not enough major events for ongoing Ion.want.uu (talk) 18:24, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Neil Sedaka

[edit]
Article: Neil Sedaka (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

 elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 22:55, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Article currently in very bad shape; needs citations and whatnot. ―Howard🌽33 01:09, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Disgustingly undercited article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 05:24, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Dan Simmons

[edit]
Article: Dan Simmons (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Newsweek
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: A major figure in sci-fi, author of Hyperion Cantos, scores of top awards. Don't know if it's blurb-worthy, but certainly qualifies for RD. Died on Feb 21, but it was reported only today Trepang2

RD: Colman McCarthy

[edit]
Article: Colman McCarthy (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Washington Post
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

 Thriley (talk) 19:34, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Ongoing: 2026 Afghanistan–Pakistan war

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2026 Afghanistan–Pakistan war (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): [18]
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Quickly escalating war that started this year. Updates still happen on a criteria-meeting basis. 🍡 DangoDino 🍡 (talk) 13:39, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. JaxsonR (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • STRONG SUPPORT Per nom, this might just escalate further...
~2026-51002-1 (talk) 18:54, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

References

[edit]

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: